麻豆影视

Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

Washington House lawmakers on Tuesday unanimously passed a bill to increase special education funding by another $185 million in the coming years.

While the funding is in line with a request from Gov. Jay Inslee, critics say it does not go far enough.

But legislative leaders, including majority Democrats, have concerns about how further increases could strain the state budget and whether removing limits on funding could open the door for some schools to claim more money than they need.

will allow up to 17.25% of a district鈥檚 population to receive funding for support services like speech therapy and instructional aides. The Legislature increased that cap from 13.5% to 15% last year. In other words, if 20% of a district鈥檚 population requires special education services, the district cannot get additional money for the remaining 5%.

According to the , the state will spend about $28.6 million more on special education in the 2023-2025 budget, $76.5 million from 2025-2027 and $80 million from 2027-2029.

Even if the bill is approved, lawmakers would separately need to provide money in the budget for the proposed increase and if they don鈥檛, the policy would not take effect.

Democratic Rep. Gerry Pollet of Seattle, chief sponsor of HB 2180, said 鈥渋t鈥檚 unconscionable and probably unconstitutional鈥� that Washington does not fund special education for every child who needs it.

Chris Reykdal, Washington鈥檚 chief education official, that the cap on funding breaks federal law. The cap is particularly burdensome on rural districts with smaller budgets, like Ocean Beach, would qualify for special education funding should the cap be removed.

Lawmakers from both parties have repeatedly called on the Legislature to end the cap entirely. But during the House floor debate, it was Republican lawmakers who forcefully decried it, including Rep. Travis Couture, R-Allyn, who introduced an amendment to remove the cap.

Couture, who has children with disabilities, said removing the cap would be 鈥渕ere pennies鈥� for the Legislature.

鈥淚 have to go home tonight and look my kids in the eyes and talk to families just like mine who go through the hell of IEP meetings and trying to get services and supports that are so desperately under-resourced,鈥� said Couture, referring to individualized education plan meetings for special education students.

鈥淎t least I think I can go back tonight and look at them and say I tried everything that I could,鈥� Couture said. 鈥淭o me, it just seems like the reason that this did not occur is because it was my idea.鈥�

Although Pollet has led the effort to remove the cap on special education in past years, he asked fellow lawmakers to vote against Couture鈥檚 amendment, saying his original bill would provide funding faster.

鈥淟et鈥檚 do the best we can right away,鈥� he said.

Last year, Pollet鈥檚 to gradually lift the cap before fully removing it by 2027-2028 was amended before passage to set the 15% limit that鈥檚 now in place.

Democratic leadership said they plan to support school funding in other ways, such as increasing compensation for paraeducators.

Senate Majority Leader Andy Billig, D-Spokane, said removing the cap would require reductions elsewhere in the state budget, and he welcomes Republican input on what should be cut.

鈥淸Republicans] think they can fund everything without cutting anything,鈥� Billig said.

is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Bill Lucia for questions: info@washingtonstatestandard.com. Follow Washington State Standard on and .

Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter